One group is a YA book group, which I think I joined by
virtue of one of the admins being someone I knew. Initially I thought, well I
don’t write YA but I have read some of what I consider YA, and have been made
to sit through movies and TV series based on YA paranormal romance. So I stuck
with it, and the other day read a really great thread on a YA writers work
getting chopped off some award nominations because of sexual content.
It got me thinking about the genre, not least because since
I joined the group I’ve written a book targeted at teens. It came about because
the oldest two kids (Charlie, 10 and Evelyn, 8) wanted a book by me that they
could read without falling asleep or reaching for a thesaurus. So I wrote one.
And now I’m thinking, what ‘category’ should it fall into?
Literature is getting like music with its genres/styles, and
like the cinema with its censorship/age classifications. In t’old days life was
fairly simple, or so I thought. We had books for kids (Dr Who books, CS Lewis,
Winnie the Pooh, Enid Blyton) and books for grown-ups (the rest). We also had
ones written for kids that adults liked (what are now called cross-over books).
The idea there was kids books for older kids that weren’t suitable for young
‘uns never really occurred to me. This was probably because by the time I was a
teenager I was reading adult ones (mainly fantasy, sci-fi) and chuckling at any
rude bits.
But there was a definite teen-literature market even then.
Books such as Catcher in the Rye, with its teen protagonist, was a popular book
amongst angst-saturated teens and the Outsiders, by SE Hinton, really got the
ball rolling in the Sixties, not least because Susan Hinton was a teenager when
she wrote it. I remember the film, with its plethora of brat-packers, and its
depiction of gang fights, smoking and drinking, and swearing. Not surprisingly
it was a perfect YA book, as it didn’t patronise its audience.
I think as a male geek-nerd of the first order I missed out
on the YA evolution in the Eighties. I recall the Flowers in the Attic by VC
Andrews being popular, but I was never clear whether that was a book for teens
or one for adults that teens read. And herein is a curious dilemma. Is the
whole idea of YA a little patronising?
YA is targeted at teens: the common age range is described
as 12-18. The bottom end is often overlapped with another genre, middle-grade,
which I think is kind of 10-12/13 ish. I find it fascinating when I think of
the maturation of adolescents between 12 and 18 just how anyone could think
there is a book whose themes/contents would be relevant or appropriate for the
whole group. I suppose what I’m pondering is the content, and what is
acceptable for MG, for YA and what is adult?
When we boil it down I think we’re looking at language, as
in expletives, sexual content and violence/horror. Even the bottom (MG) end of
the market is happy with violence. Take Harry Potter: we have plenty of scraps,
some torture, bits of murder, death, snakes eating wizards. I read Conan as a
10 year old and loved splattering viscera. The reality is that kids won’t bat
an eyelid at most violent content, within reason. Acceptable violence in YA? I
think of a 15 film: a bit of splatter, spurting vessels, guns, swords, but not
full anatomical gore and torture.
Expletives? That’s tricky too. Teenagers are the worse
swearers on the planet, as they think it’s cool. What’s OK for expletives in
the books they read? I suppose its volume, rather than precise usage, and also
whether it’s appropriately put in versus put in to titillate. For my part, I
don’t tend to put cussing in my books, even the adult ones!
And then finally we come to sexual content. As a father,
this is the one I struggle most with as I’m probably in denial about the whole
issue. Teenagers at my high school, even in the Eighties, were obsessed with
sexual themes. By the time most were 14-15 porn had crept into lives, 18 rated
sex scenes were passed around on video-tape, and a few were already practising
them. And since then we have the internet, and kids with laptops and locks on
their bedroom doors. The reality is that what we consider too rude for kids
isn’t probably a scratch on the surface compared to what they’re reading or
watching. Which isn’t to say we should condone or advocate it in our
literature. I think its all down to context, isn’t it? Pointless, exploitative,
overly detailed erotica hasn’t really got a place in YA books IMHO. Intimate
scenes, sex scenes which are relevant to characters/relationships/plots, are
surely OK in our YA books? Other aspects of sexuality, such as homosexuality
should definitely have a place. Perhaps even sexual crime (incest, rape) may be
acceptable if written in an appropriate fashion. We do our teens a disservice
by shying away.
Now, having said all of that, just because we can doesn’t
mean we have to. Books like Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials, Harry Potter,
Philip Reeves’ Mortal Engines, The Hunger Games and Cirque du Freak are tame by
the above standards yet read by adults. My book, with its group of teens being
chased by killer androids, touches on some mature concepts of identity,
self-worth and mental illness, but in a manner I think puts me in the MG
category akin to Reeves, Pullman
and Rowling. And I’m happy being there—with no cussing, shagging or
decapitation.
Until the sequel.
No comments:
Post a Comment