data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c536/2c536e0262cade3db096e5de986e26ae4b34e026" alt=""
It got me thinking about the genre, not least because since
I joined the group I’ve written a book targeted at teens. It came about because
the oldest two kids (Charlie, 10 and Evelyn, 8) wanted a book by me that they
could read without falling asleep or reaching for a thesaurus. So I wrote one.
And now I’m thinking, what ‘category’ should it fall into?
Literature is getting like music with its genres/styles, and
like the cinema with its censorship/age classifications. In t’old days life was
fairly simple, or so I thought. We had books for kids (Dr Who books, CS Lewis,
Winnie the Pooh, Enid Blyton) and books for grown-ups (the rest). We also had
ones written for kids that adults liked (what are now called cross-over books).
The idea there was kids books for older kids that weren’t suitable for young
‘uns never really occurred to me. This was probably because by the time I was a
teenager I was reading adult ones (mainly fantasy, sci-fi) and chuckling at any
rude bits.
But there was a definite teen-literature market even then.
Books such as Catcher in the Rye, with its teen protagonist, was a popular book
amongst angst-saturated teens and the Outsiders, by SE Hinton, really got the
ball rolling in the Sixties, not least because Susan Hinton was a teenager when
she wrote it. I remember the film, with its plethora of brat-packers, and its
depiction of gang fights, smoking and drinking, and swearing. Not surprisingly
it was a perfect YA book, as it didn’t patronise its audience.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbba0/fbba008d32f1efa47b7978353897f35d6fc63d8b" alt=""
YA is targeted at teens: the common age range is described
as 12-18. The bottom end is often overlapped with another genre, middle-grade,
which I think is kind of 10-12/13 ish. I find it fascinating when I think of
the maturation of adolescents between 12 and 18 just how anyone could think
there is a book whose themes/contents would be relevant or appropriate for the
whole group. I suppose what I’m pondering is the content, and what is
acceptable for MG, for YA and what is adult?
When we boil it down I think we’re looking at language, as
in expletives, sexual content and violence/horror. Even the bottom (MG) end of
the market is happy with violence. Take Harry Potter: we have plenty of scraps,
some torture, bits of murder, death, snakes eating wizards. I read Conan as a
10 year old and loved splattering viscera. The reality is that kids won’t bat
an eyelid at most violent content, within reason. Acceptable violence in YA? I
think of a 15 film: a bit of splatter, spurting vessels, guns, swords, but not
full anatomical gore and torture.
Expletives? That’s tricky too. Teenagers are the worse
swearers on the planet, as they think it’s cool. What’s OK for expletives in
the books they read? I suppose its volume, rather than precise usage, and also
whether it’s appropriately put in versus put in to titillate. For my part, I
don’t tend to put cussing in my books, even the adult ones!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89985/8998538d66048ae51f1d761f07c88ec45b6efc09" alt=""
Now, having said all of that, just because we can doesn’t
mean we have to. Books like Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials, Harry Potter,
Philip Reeves’ Mortal Engines, The Hunger Games and Cirque du Freak are tame by
the above standards yet read by adults. My book, with its group of teens being
chased by killer androids, touches on some mature concepts of identity,
self-worth and mental illness, but in a manner I think puts me in the MG
category akin to Reeves, Pullman
and Rowling. And I’m happy being there—with no cussing, shagging or
decapitation.
Until the sequel.
No comments:
Post a Comment